Going Direct Conversations
00:05:04 · Jordan Wolfe
[00:05:04] S1: Well, no, and I think that it's funny. I think it's a good segue into, I'm kind of a similar way. I've kind of landed on this thing where it's like I just keep finding myself reading a lot about political history and economic history. And I think this is how I originally came across your work, where you're in the process of writing, which this is kind of what we're going to dig into, is a five-part series on why the intelligence revolution will be decentralized. And... As we were just, you know, we were chatting before as folks who are watching or listening now, kind of the whole theme behind the Going Direct economy is building a much, much more direct decentralized system. And the main enabler to being able to do this is that is going to be AI. And the last piece that I wrote was really kind of digging into this idea of how AI at its most basic level, deep level is a coordination technology. And I don't, I think it's a very small group of people that actually really kind of Very few people outside of the field actually think about that and what are the second and third order implications and effects of that. And also, because I'm someone who believes, I just believe decentralized systems are the best way for the greatest number of people to do the best. That's just my general view on it. I really want to help whatever I can do to make sure that this intelligence resolution Intelligence revolution is, in fact, much more decentralized and open so people can have their sovereignty, especially at a time where many of our systems are breaking down. So anyways, that's the connecting point. So I wanted to start here. So we're going to kind of walk through each one of your pieces a little bit because I wanted to kind of get in your head. It's one of my favorite things to do when I come across a substack. An author who's put a lot of thought into something like this together and allow them a way to unpack their ideas. So essay one, which is the prelude, is titled, Money is a Coordination Technology That's Been Captured. And so in plain terms, can you just kind of dig deeper into what you mean by money is a coordination technology?
00:07:17 · Ben O’Hanlon
[00:07:17] S2: Money is a belief, fundamentally. So all reality is kind of internal, which is contentious. People will argue with you. And maybe there is an object reality out there, right? But I'm saying that for all intents and purposes, you know, there's that idea of as above, so below. It's like what's happening internally in someone's mind is really what's going to drive all behaviors. And so this is the interesting thing about money. You're accepting money because you believe the next person that you transact with is also going to accept it. And it's a medium of exchange. And it's a coordination technology. And it's a very interesting idea. It's a guy called Escape Key. I deliberately didn't link him in my post because his ideas are fantastic, but I didn't want to associate some of the arguments with broader conspiracy stuff. But his essential point is that if you control the inputs and the standards of a system, You don't have to come in and tell Jordan exactly what he does, right? Because you're going to be able to control the kind of macro. So think about like a desert, you know, or something like this. There are selection pressures with these standards or inputs. And this is like the monetary system. If you can control what the standards and the inputs are, you control most of the game. You don't have to own the monetary supply if you're able to control inputs and outputs, you know? So this is a really interesting idea. And the monetary supply is a coordination technology and it's civilizational management at scale because you can think about how debt's being used to wage wars like the IMF and things like this. And it's also incentives control behaviors as well. So the biggest shift that we've gone from Is essentially a commodity-backed currency, so something like gold, right? And if you're the king of Jordan land, you know, sending your men down the mine and getting the gold out, but at a certain point, the risk and the work becomes more expensive than it is to get that gold out of the mine. So there's a limit on how much gold can be in circulation because it's a physical commodity and you need to go and get it, right? The interesting thing is, I have to go and fact check my history, but like Nixon and the gold standard and moving to fiat, which is money based on nothing, based on a promise, backed by, it's basically debt, right?
00:09:43 · Ben O’Hanlon
What it's really backed by is the U.S. military, right? That's what's backing the U.S. dollar. But it's fascinating as a chessboard, right? Like we're not even having to make moral judgments at this point. We're just saying... Now that the US dollar doesn't have to be linked to how much gold or the commodity that can be get out of the ground, I'm just using that as my analogy, right? Sure. They can print as much as they want of it. And so they can go and capture the standards and the inputs of other systems as well. So this kind of coordination technology to normal people, to normies, they're just trying to have kids and get on in the world and do well. And so they're not studying these kind of things. And so money is just money. They don't have to overthink it, right? But it's really interesting the substrates that are below it because everything is organized fundamentally about an exchange of value and money is the proxy of that value. So it's sort of our time and our work that's being stolen. So I explained to my son, it's like a hidden tax. They're devaluing what's in your pocket. You can't see it. You can't see this theft happening. And the people that benefit from it are those where they are closest to the money printer. So when I print money, there's a beautiful story about the angel Gabriel. And everybody's praying. Everybody's praying. Oh, please, God, give me more money. I'm so pleased. And so he doubles the money in everybody's pocket overnight. And everybody wakes up. And the question is, who benefits first? Who benefits from that? The people that benefit are those that spend the money first because that's what everything is priced in. And as all of the money, nothing else has been doubled. The same amount of houses, cars, hours in the day, it's all the same, right? So as double that money enters circulation, what you'll find is the price of everything goes up because the relative value hasn't devalued the money, right? So this is the kind of theft of And by the way, I'm not, I'll loop back to this. It's a kind of, it's a kind of theft where you're selling future generations down the road because it's a never ending debt that can't ever be paid off, right? Without even getting into who owns debt, right? And it's future generations that have to pay it. So the other interesting thing I haven't worked in Web3 is like, What are these taxes?
00:12:11 · Ben O’Hanlon
Why are we all paying taxes? Because you could, me and Jordan can go and create a currency and we could have a low level of inflation that would represent taxes with which we're going to do things like fund the government. Where's my roads? We're going to build roads. Don't worry. So we'll use that inflation to go and build some roads and whatever else it is that we need. And we'll be transparent about it. And we'll say, well, you know, the currency is going to be inflated a little bit because we're going to need to spend some more money here and here. But We transpound, right? But that isn't what happens. So, like, why are we all paying taxes? It's because we're in a feudal system and we're servants on the land, right? And they want you to know, jordan, you're paying us taxes because you owe us, we're your lead. You owe us a fidelity, this kind of thing. So, I think, like, part of, like, and the reason I wrote the series, by the way, is I was talking to a mum, actually, at my kid's A birthday party my son was at. And my experience, and I'm not saying I'm super smart, but I think maybe some developers would recognize this. It can be very lonely if you're smart or clever because you'll often try and communicate things that people are not, they're just not able to meet you where you're at. And so for a long, long part of my life, I thought that I was really bad at communicating. I was oversharing. I was, you know, always taking this feedback on board. And so the point of this series is I'm just going to write this out so that I can release this like real just, oh, fatigue in trying to explain some ideas to people, you know, like, so I wanted to write it out because I wanted to set out the argument, as you put so well earlier, where we're going to is an inevitable counterintelligence revolution and an information insurgency. I'm fucking here for it. I'm here for it. You were made for it. I was born for this. I was born for it. I constantly think about that. But just to unlock one point before I wrap up on that, it's like there's two things going on, right? There's the material world. We talked about the monetary system, the commodities, this kind of stuff, right? But there's people's beliefs. This is like an epiphany I had. There was a song that was playing and it was about a superposition.
00:14:35 · Ben O’Hanlon
And where I'm at now is there's this distributed cognitive field across everybody's minds. We'll just take America for sake, everybody's minds, right? And these minds are made up of probabilities and uncertainties. And in fact, they may even be massively modular, right? So you're dealing with Many co-occurring minds that have these beliefs and probabilities. Let's just call them models. They have these models of the world, right? Math is not the territory, right? And there's this latent charge across all of it, right? This kind of like superposition across all of these minds. And it is a superposition because... It's beyond time. It's all of the generations that live before you, everyone that passed a torch to get Jordan to the point that he's at today, right? That all exists because there's the genetics, which is your DNA that's been passed down, but there's the mimetics, which is your culture and the ideas and even the value systems and, you know, the words we're using here, right? So this superposition exists and then, and I think about it and it's almost like a metaphysical thing as opposed to like material. And it's interesting because in a paradigm that we're in now where there's so much fear, uncertainty and doubt, where like this existential threat that everybody is facing, which I think is kind of coordinated to some extent, right? All these hacks that are happening now and all the mass papers got released at the same time. It's like, okay, yeah, maybe this is all just happening, or maybe this is a theater, a story, and we're being introduced to whatever, the new world order, whatever's All right. Superposition is simply that field, that entanglement of all of those hopes, fears, and certainties. And all these individuals are looking for certainty. They want to resolve this tension. And I think there's a huge opportunity In being able to collapse the superposition. And I'm being mercenary here as well because I have to go and, you know, earn a class, right? So I think about these things both from the point of view of like the common good and also how I can navigate and be more effective in these things. So why are people early? Why do they seem to be early, right?
00:16:52 · Ben O’Hanlon, Jordan Wolfe
I think you're early when you're Engaging in that superposition and collapsing it to your benefit one way or the other, whether you're a state or whether you're an individual or whether you're a business, right? And so what you're trying to do is not, let me, I'm almost touching on this. It's very costly as a business to try and go and deal with an industry where everything is known and calcified and you're going to go and try and take what you're doing to market, right? It's much easier, in some senses, much lower cost, to be able to get in early before there's a consensus. [00:17:29] S1: Sure, before markets form inefficiencies.