The Twenty Minute VC (20VC): Venture Capital | Startup Funding | The Pitch
00:24:31 · Harry Stebbings, David Tisch
[00:24:31] S1: Can I ask you, what's your win rate? [00:24:33] S0: So different market conditions, it ebbs and flows probably between 7090%. And I think the single factor that causes us to lose the most is getting to something too late. Like speed of our decision making and accessing the opportunity are the two factors that we control that hurt us the most. There's a subset of companies that just meet us and don't want us. But that's harder to course correct because you almost don't know why they didn't like you. It's like a EQ emotional outcome, or they didn't think you were valuable enough, or maybe they referenced you and they got something that said, Not as good as you need them to be. I think we care a lot about those situations, but I think that happens sometimes. The ones that I think we organizationally can work on is how do we get to everything before everybody else? And I think that's the obsession. We're a team of 10 investors. There are six partners at the firm. We've all worked together for a long time. We all like each other and we all do the work. Like, our job every day is to wake up and meet the next founder that we're excited about.
00:25:41 · Harry Stebbings, David Tisch
[00:25:41] S1: I think both of us having flexibility to not have to be lead. Like, again, I I admitted my wrongdoing. I I turned down great businesses over time because of ownership, and it was terrible decisions. And so now we invest very differently. We will absolutely do the 1% or 2% if we think it's an unbelievable founder and it's an amazing opportunity. So great. That means I I never lose because I will just do a smaller check. Well, not never, but you know what I mean. Rarely lose because you... But if I had to only lead, that would come down dramatically. And so my question to you is, do the pure play lead only seed funds still have a business? [00:26:21] S0: What are the pure play lead only seed funds left? [00:26:24] S1: I mean, I think you've got your, like, uncorks, your floodgates, your... I mean, too certain no. First round? [00:26:33] S0: I think they've moved into a different style of investing and more flexible and play it a little bit later when necessary, unlike strategic purpose. [00:26:42] S1: So what you're saying is that business doesn't exist anymore. [00:26:46] S0: I don't want to be in that business. [00:26:47] S1: And why is that? [00:26:48] S0: Because I don't think you can compete against the greatest firms in the world who are running that strategy as part of what they do. [00:26:57] S1: With much less price sensitivity and much bigger checkbooks. [00:27:00] S0: Yeah. I don't even think that's a factor. They're great at what they do. I like very much pedestal.
00:27:00 · David Tisch, Harry Stebbings
[00:27:00] S0: Yeah. I don't even think that's a factor. They're great at what they do. I like very much pedestal. [00:27:05] S1: I I do think it is a fact. Like, we have lost to, like, a GC of the world, and with respect, a junior there. And I don't mean that disparagingly, but someone who is more junior because they offer treble the price and treble the check. I agree with the founder for taking it. Like, wholly within your right to do it, but that's why.
00:27:23 · David Tisch
[00:27:23] S0: Yeah, but it's an offer in the market, a free market, and I think they take the majority of the air out of the room if you're trying to compete for, I'm gonna lead, sit on your board or not sit on your board, but I need 10% to 15% of your seed company. I just think there's a greater efficiency to access the multistage firms and the multistage firms are happy to do those deals. I also think like what you've seen happen is it used to be a lot of firms would be like, okay, I'm not going to do this. I want to wait to see this at the A, or I'm not going to do this at the A, I want to wait to see this at the B. And what's happened is they don't get to see it. That might have been your only shot to do the deal because there's an efficiency in the market and there's other people that also want to do it at the B and you might lose there and you might lose at the C. And so what you're seeing is if Sequoia wins, it might mean that, you know, Andreessen or Kleiner or someone else needs to immediately come into the next round because they know that that's the best probability they have of getting a real check into that company. And they do it quickly and they do it aggressively. And I think that if you lose head to head in a seed and an a and a b, you can either put your tail between your legs and call it a day, or you can try to figure out a new entry point with minimal progress and minimal developments to get your check into that company, if you believe that was an important one.
00:28:49 · Harry Stebbings
[00:28:49] S1: I think it's an amazing point that there was a willingness to wait before that's now gone. I think that's absolutely right and very pertinent. Can I ask you, though? I speak to so many LPs. As we said, they love to talk. And every LP wants one category of venture. We want the pure play seed investor in Silicon Valley, small fund under a 100,000,000 pure play seed. And I go, that is the single worst fucking segment to be in. That's the one segment you don't wanna be in. And they all kind of look at me rather horrified. What advice would you give an LP when they look at the segments today and go, ah, I want pure play seed in San Francisco as my bucket?
00:29:27 · David Tisch
[00:29:27] S0: I'm gonna answer your question in a roundabout I think there are three different stakeholders in our industry and their incentives and current conditions are very decoupled. Like we're in a founder world. I think GPs are struggling to have a very static and focused strategy because of we're in a founder friendly world. And I think LPs are frustrated because they want certain versions of exposure or portfolio construction that basically aren't available. And I don't think there's an easy solve for the LP problems. And I don't think there's a clean way to operate as a GP in a ever changing market that is very complicated right now. And so I think founders get the leverage. They get to raise capital from people they like at prices that they like. And you as a GP can say yes or no. And on the LP side, they're gonna look at your portfolio construction, your entry point, your ownership. And then a lot of the multistage funds have multiple products that LPs will tell you and me that they don't like to do, but yet it's gonna be the majority of their allocation into venture is going to go to the multistage firms that are established. It are a way to get scaled capital into the industry. And frankly, like exposure to some of the best companies in the industry through that. So your question is around like the LP conditions. I believe my relationship with our partners is one of truth. We invest out of a $275,000,000 seed fund right now. It will invest in around 150 companies. So we are pure play seed with lack of a focus on ownership and concentration. There is a large cohort of LPs that are confused by our math and doesn't think it works, and that don't believe in our model.