Y Combinator Startup Podcast
00:21:56 · Garry Tan
Emergent out of our summer twenty four batch went from public launch to 9 figures of revenue in eight months. When they crossed $15,000,000 in annualized revenue, they were 15 people. Retail, winter twenty four, hit 60,000,000 annualized with about 40. That revenue per person did not exist before, not in software, not in oil, not in railroads. And these aren't freaks of nature. They're the first companies built natively on the new physics, and every one of them started as one or two people wired the way I just described. Now picture our batch room in the dog patch, Hundreds of founders every single day, each one of them doing what used to be a person's entire year of work. That is not the future. That is the bar right now with this batch. If you're not doing it, your competitor is, and they will eat your lunch politely and thank you for it. It also changes what software even is. Software doesn't have to be precious anymore. You can build exactly the tool you need for the audience of one in a weekend. The old advice was scratch your own itch and hope it's a market. The new version is much better. Scratch your own itch because scratching itches is nearly free, and some of your tools for one will turn out to be entire companies. You'll know because other people start begging for them. And one honest caveat before the how to because you catch me out in any way. A brain nobody curates is a garbage dump with great search. Retrieval will surface a stale fact with total confidence. A bad skill file encodes a bad process forever. So the primitive is memory plus hygiene, provenance on every fact, contradiction checks when new information collides with old, and a librarian whose actual job is pruning. Treat the brain like production infrastructure and it compounds. Treat it like a dumping ground, and you get a very confident agent that is wrong in ways nobody can trace. Everything so far is philosophy and receipts. So let's get into some how to. If you do what I describe in the next six minutes, you'll be ahead of 99% of people who watched this talk and just nodded. Step one tonight, pick a harness and run an agent on your own machine. I use OpenClaw and Hermes agent with g brain. A hosted version of this is at gbrain.io. It's free. G brain itself is free and open source. I always recommend the Ferrari. But I'll be honest, the Honda is really good too.
00:24:42 · Garry Tan
Codex, Claude code, whatever. Any of them will do 99% of this. And the upside of not Ferrari is that it will also get you to your destination with a little less of... Less getting out to fix it on the side of the road. The concepts are the point, not any given repo or product. The intelligence is untapped, and there are many paths. Step two this weekend, start your library. Not a grand archive. One folder of markdown files, export your notes, export your email if you can. Write one page about each project you're working on and each person you work with. And on those pages, write the things you actually know, what you're building together, what they care about, what you owe them, what they said last time. That stuff no model on the earth... No model on earth has because it only exists in your head. And your head, as we established, only holds seven things. The first time an agent answers a question using your context instead of the Internet's, you'll feel the click and you won't go back. You're all sitting on... You are all sitting on five, ten years of your own history in one inbox or another. That's your moat just lying there, unindexed, doing nothing. The only gate between you and this entire architecture is probably twenty four hours. Step three, write your first skill file. Picking it is easy. You know, what's the task you do every single week that you hate the most? Might be expense reports, meeting notes, the weekly status update, competitor research. Explain it to your agent. What do you wanna do? In plain English, the way you'd explain to a smart friend on their first day of a job. And then let it get it wrong. If it gets it wrong, correct it. Every rule, every exception, every oh, and also, put it in there, and it'll fix it. That page is now an employee. Run it. Step four, wire it up to be a recurring job. Maybe it's the job you just created in step three. Every morning at seven, do this. Every Friday, summarize that. The first time you wake up to work that finished while you slept, something shifts in your head permanently. That's the day that the day stops being the unit of work for you. It becomes what you can imagine, and it should be driven by what your goals are and what you wanna create in the world. Step five, this is the discipline that separates the compounders from the dabblers. Never do one off work.
00:27:26 · Garry Tan
Most people run one operation with one agent and then throw the context away. They close the window. That's it. Don't. At the end of every task, ask the agent to Skillify what it did. Skillify is a special skill you can find in g brain. You can point it at that repo and say, extract Skillify, learn how to do it. Turn it into a markdown file you can use and reuse forever. I'll say it the way I say it at YC. If you have to ask for something twice, you failed. The person who captures what they learn gets smarter every single day. The person who wakes up every morning with amnesia, well, that... That's a waste of your time. And it sort of doesn't matter how good the model gets if you can't turn it into real memory. Do those five things and I can tell you what your next ninety days look like. Week one, honestly, it's a toy. The library's thin. The skills are clumsy. You're fixing more than you're saving. Week four, the flywheel catches. The agent starts answering with your context. The morning job produces something you actually read, and you write your third and fourth skill because the first two worked. Week twelve, you have a library that answers before you finish asking. A dozen skill files running the parts of your week you used to dread, and one or two tools that other people keep asking to borrow, which in this room is called a startup. The curve is the same curve as any compounding thing you've ever seen. Flat, flat, flat, then not. Most people who try this will quit this in week two, which is precisely why the ones who don't feel like they're cheating by week twelve. Now I need to tell you the part that isn't fun because everything I taught you just cuts both ways. I told you Spinoza's definition of sadness earlier, the feeling of your power acting... Power of acting decreasing. And I said it gets political. This is where. A skill file is not a document. It's a piece of your cognition, how you do the thing, extracted from your head, written down, and executable. Every skill you teach an agent is you, externalized. And the exact same file is two opposite futures depending on one variable, who controls it. Take a fictional example of a support engineer. Let's call her Maya. Over two years, Maya teaches her agents 40 skills. How to triage a p zero at two in the morning. How to deescalate the customer who's about to churn.
00:30:11 · Garry Tan
How to write a postmortem that actually prevents the next incident. 40 files. That's her judgment. The thing that took her two years to build sitting on a disk. Version one, those files live in Maya's repo. She changes jobs. They go with her. Day one at a new company, she's operating with years of compounded judgment on tap. Every year she works, she compounds. That's ownership. And if she wanted to start a company that does this, it's her expertise, and it turns out she can. Entire startups these days will be markdown files. Version two, those files live in the company's repo under the company's IT policy. Maya leaves with nothing. The company keeps running her judgment without her. 40 files executing forever, and her name isn't even in the commit history. She didn't have a career. She had an extraction. Same files, same Maya, one variable. So this is the doctrine, and I want you to be able to repeat it tomorrow. I believe skill files are yours. Own your skills, because if you don't, your job becomes a skill file. And this happened before. Craftsmen owned their tools. That's what made them free. The factory broke that. The loom belonged to the mill. The knowledge workers assumed we were safe because our tools lived in our heads where nobody could confiscate them. Skill files end that. For the first time in history, your cognition can be extracted, stored, versioned, and owned. The only question is, by whom? Remember... Do you remember the thousand guilders? That offer never went away. It got rebranded. Every comfortable arrangement where your judgment compounds in someone else's repo is a thousand guilders a year to show up, keep quiet, and stop building your own thing. And that's why you should start a startup because this is how you can actually make those skill files work for you. Spinoza faced the upgraded version too. In 1673, Heidelberg offered the cursed heretic a full professorship, salary, legitimacy, a chair, and quote freedom of philosophizing provided he not disturb the established religion. His answer was, I do not know what the limits of that freedom of philosophizing might have to be. He read the terms of service and he declined the acquisition. He had a phrase for what he was protecting, under your own power, as opposed to under someone else's. Your power of acting exists either way.
00:32:53 · Garry Tan
The political question in 1673 and in 2026 is who commands it? Personal AI is about controlling your own cognitive abilities and protecting yourself. That's the whole thesis of this talk in one sentence. Personal AGI is how you stay under your own power in the age of agents. So keep your brain and your skills in a repo you control from day one before any platform or any acquirer has an opinion about it. When Spinoza died, they inventoried the room. Two pairs of pants, seven shirts, a lens lathe, a 160 books. And the ethics locked in a desk. He owned almost nothing, and nobody ever controlled his skill files. The desk drawer was his repo. Own yours like he owned his. Now three objections, and I can hear them from up here, so let's just do them. Objection one, the models are improving so fast that all this harness stuff will be obsolete. Just wait for the next release. This is the better... Bitter lesson crowd, and I love them, but notice what actually happens in every model release. The better the models get, the more the differentiator moves to context. When everyone's engine is a thousand horsepower, the race is won on the driver and the map. The weights are everyone's. The library is yours. At least I hope it is. A better model makes your library worth more because a smarter reader extracts more from the same books. I'm rooting for the labs as hard as anyone in this building. But every release they ship is a free upgrade to a workforce I already own and a workforce I want you to own. Objection two. Is this just rag? Sure. And Postgres is just b trees. Retrieval is the primitive, not the product. The hard part is everything around it. What gets written down in the first place, how it gets enriched and linked, what gets promoted to hot memory versus filed as cold cold reference, who arbitrates when two facts disagree, retrieval is easy. Being worth retrieving from is the product. Objection three, and it's the one that deserves the most respect. You put your entire life in one system, your email, your meetings, your kid's schedules. What happens when it leaks? My answer is the same answer as the whole talk. That's exactly why it has to be yours. My brain runs on my own infra in my own repo, under my own keys. Compare that to the default, which is not privacy.
00:35:33 · Garry Tan
The default is your life is already scattered across 10 clouds owned by companies whose incentives are not yours, searchable by everyone except you. I didn't create the risk by consolidating my context. I took custody of it. Custody is the security model. And if you don't trust yourself to hold the keys, I promise you the answer isn't trusting someone else's terms of service more. So why did I open source all of it? The harness, the brain architecture, the skills, the whole personal operating system. People ask me this because they seem like... They they they think there must be a catch. Well, the answer is because I can. Because being at YC for me means I don't have to monetize my own infrastructure. But because I can is also the answer to the wrong question. The real question is why anyone should. And the answer is that I believe tools of the powerful should be given away. Every era has a private technology of leverage, a thing the powerful have and everyone else doesn't. For a long time, it was literacy. Then, it was capital. Right now, today, it's this, the harness, the library, the workforce made of markdown. The people who have it are quietly operating at a different scale than the people who don't. And the gap is widening every month. And that's what this whole conference is about, to give you the power to be able to do it for yourself. When something like that, that powerful stays private, you get a priesthood. When it gets given away, you get a renaissance. I know which one I want to live in, which means I get to do the thing that I actually believe in. And I'll give it to you as a creed because it's the closest thing I have to one. Say the things other people won't. Fund the people other people won't. Build the buildings other people won't. Write and give away the code that other people won't. Leave behind the institutions that other people won't. And when you build in the open, you should know what's coming because Spinoza's story has one more chapter. November 1676, Gottfried Leibniz, the most glittering genius in Europe, silk stockings, a calculating machine in his luggage, travels to The Hague to spend three days in an attic with the most hated man on the continent. And then he spends the next forty years lying about it. Publicly, the visit was a few hours in passing. Privately, his notes are crammed with obsessive commentary on Spinoza.