Lenny's Podcast: Product | Career | Growth
00:22:06 · Benedict Evans, Lenny Rachitsky
Maybe in like three, five, 10 years, yes, that whole estate will look radically different, and all those jobs will have changed, but it will take two, three, four, five, 10 years, and it will take time sector by sector, and it will take time for people to work out, "You could do that thing with this." And one of the companies I always remember that we looked at when I was at Andreessen Horowitz is a company called Frame.io, which is video editing, video collaboration. And there's nothing there that you couldn't have done at least five years earlier, and maybe 10 years earlier. And actually, that's kind of a bad example because that relies on a bunch of stuff like cutting edge web technologies. But if you go out and pick 10 random SaaS companies that were started the day before ChatGPT launched, how many of them could have been founded at any point in the previous 15 years? The delay was somebody realizing, "Oh, that problem exists inside that industry, and this is the way that we would solve it." It didn't all happen the day after Google Docs. It took like 10, 15, 20 years for people to invent all that stuff, and work out that you could do that with this. And so all of that is like, the way of saying, well, yes, it is going to be quick, but actually, no, it will kind of take a while for people to work out how to completely change how their business works. [00:23:18] S1: Your view is so comforting, because basically it's like, okay, this is a huge deal, but we've been through many transformations before, and it's going to be okay.
00:23:28 · Benedict Evans
[00:23:28] S0: Well, I have a slide towards the end of the presentation, which I know the title is something like, "This is going to be completely different from everything else, just like everything else." And then the next slide is an IBM ad from the '50s, which has got this sea of white men holding up in white shirts and ties, all holding up flood rules. And the slogan of the title of the ad is, it's an IBM ad, it says, "An IBM electronic calculator..." This before it was called a computer, "... it's an electronic calculator it's the size of a fridge." Is like having 150 extra engineers. How many people listening to this company list, like their company slogan is basically will give you 150 extra engineers? I mean, isn't that like the whole pitch of Claude Code? 150 expert engineers for free. Or not free, that's like a lot of money. And yeah, that's what I gave you. And so yes, we keep going through this over and over and over again, just to kind of make that tangible. I mean, obviously we couldn't be doing this without the internet. So there's a slide in my presentation, which is, we could maybe talk about, but it's a slide of chart showing how many products are stocked in supermarkets in America since the '50s. And the point of the slide is to say that barcodes allowed supermarkets to stock way more stuff because they could keep track of it. But making that chart, I had to know there was a thing called the Food Marketing Institute. And I had to have found out that they published a number for how many scoots there were in supermarkets every year. And then I had to realize they've been around since the '50s. And if I could dug long enough, I might be able to make a whole time series, and I could make whole chart. Now imagine doing that in 1994. First of all, you would have no idea that exists. You really need to go and find a library where they publish, and they publish that number. And that the numbers in that report, you'd have no idea. Then you need to find a library that had them. So you're going to spend like three days on the phone, and spend like $50 on long distance phone calls to find a library that has these. Or maybe you call the Food Marketing Institute and they say, "We'll sell them to you for $500 each." So then you're going to get on, maybe you live in New York, or someone that has this.
00:25:31 · Benedict Evans, Lenny Rachitsky
And two weeks later you've got the chart and you look at it. And then the other side of this is the life of an analyst is you spend all day making a chart and you look at it and go, "Oh, that's not really interesting." So you spend two weeks to make the chart and then you look at it and go, "Yeah, I'm not going to use that." And for me, this was like two hours in Google. And so we forget how big a deal the internet was. That's a long way of saying it. But we forget we've had these absolutely enormous changes, and then we don't see it, because it's like that's the world the world's always been. [00:26:03] S1: What's different potentially this time, just even what your quote is, it's different, everything's going to change just like last time, the big difference obviously is AGI might emerge, and super intelligence. Does the work of humans can do a lot of this stuff for us, can actually replace jobs? Just like thoughts on that element of this transformation we're going through.
00:26:27 · Benedict Evans
[00:26:27] S0: I don't know. This is one of the ways I've struggled to write about AI is like certainly in 2023, early '24, all the questions were questions you could have asked in December 2022. And the questions didn't really change. And the strategies didn't really change. And I think the AGI question is kind of the same. I mean, the thing that the observation one can make, we have no theory of what human intelligence is, we have no theory of why these models work so well, we have no theory of how much better they will get. So we're all just kind of vibes forecasting as to what will happen. And then you can have like the 20 AM doped out philosophy students talking about, "Hey man, is this consciousness?" "Maybe we aren't conscious either. We just think we are." "Yeah, great. Thank you." I think the one thing one can observe today is we have no idea. We don't know. We can guess, but we don't really know where this is going to end up. What I think you can say today is that there's a lot of kind of redefinition of terms. So I think a quote I used in my presentation late last year was an AI scientist called Larry Tesler who said AI is whatever machines can't do yet, because once machines can do it, people say, "Well, that's your software." And so certainly, I mean, I did do a poll on social media every now and then asking, "Is machine learning still AI?" Because I've certainly heard people say, "Well, that's not AI. That's just image recognition" "That's not AI. That's just sentiment analysis." So AI, it's a bit like the word technology. It's like if it's new, then it's technology. But in the '60s airline, jet airlines is the technology. Now a jet airline isn't tech. And so there's a sort of sense of AI is like a moving target, is whatever just started working. And I think the point here is now clearly you can see people redefining AGI to mean the stuff that works now. So is AEI, what's the definition now? It's like it can do a certain percentage of economically valuable work. Well, that's a very different thing too. It has a soul and it's fucking alive. Because a database could do that. Like an IBM mainframe in 1975 could do a meaningful percentage of economically valuable work that was previously done by people. And it turned out there was a whole bunch of other stuff that it couldn't do that we didn't do then, we didn't know existed.
00:28:30 · Benedict Evans
So there's a lot of creative redefinition here. Superintelligence, I'm not sure, is superintelligence more than AGI or less than AGI? Because last year I thought superintelligence was like really good, but not as good, not actual AGI. And now it's like, "Oh no, no, we've already got AGI, but superintelligence, that's really hard." It's funny, I was having an argument on Hacker News this morning, you remember the argument, which is never a good use of time, but you remember the argument of like people would argue about whether crypto is blockchain, or whether blockchain is crypto. There isn't a right answer to that. Let's just be sure. It's important to understand what you mean when you say that, but there isn't like a correct answer to this. Are we going to get to something that has human level intelligence? We don't know. I don't think we have any way of answering that question. Maybe, maybe not. You can make arguments either way. Meantime, in the meanwhile, we've got this thing that's clearly kind of a completely transformative technology. And maybe the serious point here is like you don't have to believe, even if the model stopped it getting better tomorrow. If this is it and we hit a brick wall tomorrow, this is an incredibly useful technology that's going to change your world and get rolled out over the next 10 years. So you don't have to believe in any of that stuff to believe that this is a giant deal.
00:29:46 · Lenny Rachitsky
[00:29:46] S1: Something that's definitely changed, I had your former boss, Mark Andreessen on the podcast, and we didn't actually talk about this during the conversation, and he brought it up before we started recording and I never got to it, is he had this insight that the opportunity set for companies now is so much larger. We used to have no trillion-dollar companies, now we're going to have dozens of trillion-dollar companies. Just like the size companies can grow to are going up so much, and valuations also go up along with that. And his point is just people haven't really grokked just how large companies can get now. Everyone's hitting a hundred million AR in five months, six months. Just thoughts on that.