Lenny's Podcast: Product | Career | Growth
00:26:47 · Lenny Rachitsky, Anish Acharya
[00:26:47] S0: Drinking them all. [00:26:48] S1: I push myself really hard to ship something with every new model that comes out, and I think you learn so much. I think for people who believe the models are commodities or totally fungible, you just haven't actually used the models. And for example, in the last few weeks I've been obsessed with Qwen 3.8-Max. Qwen is an awesome model. It's very good at long horizon tasks, and it's actually really creative. It's a great storyteller. So, I've been using it to create these impossible documentaries, mostly of planets of the Star Wars universe. I did Tatooine, which turned out great. I did Bespin last night, and it can just work for four or five hours. It tells a great story, it generates all the video using the MiniMax model via Fal, generates audio via Eleven. It actually directs the movie, the five-minute movie, and then it cuts all of the clips in. It overlays it, it watches it. It's just extraordinary. It's got a totally different shape than GLM-5.2. GLM-5.3 just came out, which I used for a bunch of product work. It doesn't have a vision component, and it's sort of like this neurotic PhD you put in the corner, and they both have the role. This is a little bit of these tension of models. It's not that one is ahead of another, one is more intelligent, it's rather one has a mind that's shaped in one direction, perhaps creativity and openness for Qwen, and others that are shaped in other directions like neuroticism and precision like GLM-5.3. So, I just make something with every model and that's how I build my intuition.
00:28:22 · Lenny Rachitsky, Anish Acharya
[00:28:22] S0: How important is this habit, do you think, for people? Because I hear a lot that it's really important to be using these models. And a secondary question is how do you come up with what to do with these models? Because a lot of people want to try these things. They're like, "Okay, what do I do?" [00:28:37] S1: I know. [00:28:37] S0: Any suggestions? [00:28:38] S1: Well, I think almost all of us have got ... The most insufferable thing for a long time was your app idea friend. Every time you went to have a beer they're like, "Let me tell you my app idea." You're like, "Oh, here we go again." We have got to be the app idea guys now, and all the silly ideas, actually, especially the silly ideas, because those are the ones that often have the most alpha, are the ones that we should all be building. So, I've probably got two dozen apps that I've built, I've got one or two large apps that I iterate on. And I think that if you don't have a chassis with which to use the models, it's just really hard to come up with an idea from scratch every time. So, I'd say work on something. It's actually better if it's not important with a capital I, and then keep finding new ways to invest in it and add to it with a model as a kind of tool rather than as a goal. Does that make sense? [00:29:27] S0: Yeah. Maybe even zooming out, I've been thinking more and more one of the most important habits to build right now is to, whenever you're about to do something, ask yourself, "How can AI do this for me?" [00:29:38] S1: Totally.
00:29:38 · Anish Acharya, Lenny Rachitsky
[00:29:38] S1: Totally. [00:29:38] S0: I'm visualizing this input to response, the whole idea of there's a space between input and response, and meditation helps you think more deeply before you respond. And I feel like the trick now is insert in that moment, "How can AI help me with this?" [00:29:53] S1: I mean, I'm also a longtime meditator. We should talk about that if you like, but yeah, I think that's right. I think in our day-to-day knowledge work, sometimes it's less obvious to me. I guess my mind is I've always been a consumer product person, I love products. So for me, it's easier to think of a new feature to add to my DJ streaming app or my Google Reader for X that I use than it is to find a part of my life to automate. But you're right, there's some fun examples. I posted about one a few weeks ago where I had my laptop transcribe everything that was happening in the kitchen, and then it would award or detract screen time from my son's iPad depending on whether he was being good or bad. So, it was a fun little social experiment. It also had a fun outcome, which is that he recorded a video of himself saying, "I love you, Dad," over and over, and put it next to the mic. [00:30:42] S0: To hack the metrics? [00:30:43] S1: To hack the metrics. So yes, anything becomes a measure it's no longer useful, but it was just a cool little social experiment. I think those things are super fun. [00:30:54] S0: That is hilarious. So, one of the measures was how often he said, "I love you," and that was going to give him more free time?
00:30:54 · Lenny Rachitsky, Anish Acharya
[00:30:54] S0: That is hilarious. So, one of the measures was how often he said, "I love you," and that was going to give him more free time? [00:31:00] S1: Is he saying things that are positive and pro-social- [00:31:00] S0: That is so funny. [00:31:03] S1: ... or negative and antisocial? And saying, "I love you," is very pro-social. [00:31:07] S0: That's so funny. I had a friend who built this little device that measured how often he and his kid laugh throughout the day. [00:31:14] S1: Oh, that's nice. [00:31:15] S0: Yeah. He hacked one of those Limitless pendants to do that, and then they just look at that metric every day. [00:31:21] S1: And this is what I mean, man. I think we spent a lot of the time on the show so far really intriguing, talking about productivity, job loss, all these heady, important topics with a capital I, but what you just described, how often you laugh, that's not a startup, that's probably not an economically consequential idea, but it is for the quality of our life. And I think we tend to think that happiness is fixed, but what if it's not? If you and I were doing jobs 100 years ago, what would our jobs be? I promise they'd be less cool than they are right now, and maybe 100 years from now they'll be that much cooler. So, I think that the thing that gets often missed, and this is why I'm a fan of Claude and others, is just how can this thing add texture to our human lives even if they don't have economic consequences?
00:31:21 · Anish Acharya, Lenny Rachitsky
[00:31:21] S1: And this is what I mean, man. I think we spent a lot of the time on the show so far really intriguing, talking about productivity, job loss, all these heady, important topics with a capital I, but what you just described, how often you laugh, that's not a startup, that's probably not an economically consequential idea, but it is for the quality of our life. And I think we tend to think that happiness is fixed, but what if it's not? If you and I were doing jobs 100 years ago, what would our jobs be? I promise they'd be less cool than they are right now, and maybe 100 years from now they'll be that much cooler. So, I think that the thing that gets often missed, and this is why I'm a fan of Claude and others, is just how can this thing add texture to our human lives even if they don't have economic consequences? [00:32:05] S0: Yeah. Along these lines I saw somewhere you have this really interesting take that the big opportunity, maybe just in consumer, but broadly is this idea of, "Loop, make me happier." [00:32:16] S1: Yeah. [00:32:17] S0: Talk about that.
00:32:18 · Anish Acharya
[00:32:18] S1: Oh, yeah. I mean, I think that we believe that people want to be more productive, but they don't. I think more people want to spend time than save time. There's a reason the biggest products in the world are entertainment and social. So, we get at the heart of how do we deliver the value to the consumer? I think for most consumers, sometimes I tease and I say it's like the Instagram AI user versus the X AI user. The X AI user is fearful of being outside of the permanent underclass, is really opinionated on GLM-5.3 versus Kimi K3. They're just so pilled. And then the Instagram person is like, "Oh, this is like a better Google search. Kind of. It's cool." They don't get what all the hype is about. And it's really a product design failure. We have the capabilities to radically transform people's lives. I mean, Lenny, in many ways we spent 40 years building a technology that enables better spreadsheets. We built this technology that extends our intellect, but nothing to extend our soul. And I think that we have a little bit of a spiritual hunger, especially as a lot of these cultural institutions have gone away that fulfilled that, especially in the rest of America where you don't have as many hot yoga classes, and Pilates, and fasting, and Friendsgiving. So, I think that the opportunity for this technology is like, hey, the basics of consumer need, how do we feel more connected, more loved? How do we make progress? How do we have fun? The things that we all aspire to, the basics, how do we apply this technology to those areas? That's what I want to see more of. And again, I don't think it's a model or a capability challenge. It's just a product design challenge.