Lenny's Podcast: Product | Career | Growth
00:13:51 · Lenny Rachitsky, Adam Mosseri
[00:13:51] S1: Benedict Evans was on the podcast recently, said the same thing, "We don't want to know anything about what's going on." [00:13:56] S0: Yeah, yeah. I like him a lot. I'll make sure I listen to the pod. [00:14:00] S1: Yeah. So you talked about taste. This makes me think about ... So you're interviewing a lot of people, hiring a lot of people. What are some traits that are trending up in things that you look for more and more now in this world? And what are some traits that are trending down, and maybe less important to you?
00:14:00 · Lenny Rachitsky, Adam Mosseri
[00:14:00] S1: Yeah. So you talked about taste. This makes me think about ... So you're interviewing a lot of people, hiring a lot of people. What are some traits that are trending up in things that you look for more and more now in this world? And what are some traits that are trending down, and maybe less important to you? [00:14:17] S0: I mean, there are some things that are the same. So for the longest time, almost no matter what the function, I always look for three things. Do you have sort of grit? You've got some drive, some fire in your belly. Are you a quick learner? And are you reasonably ideally very self-aware so that you can actually take feedback and know what you're good at and know you're not good? Because if you are those things, if you got fire in your belly, you learn quickly and you're self-aware, you can kind of get good at anything eventually. But if any of those things are missing, there's usually an issue, so that's the baseline. Right now for hiring, but just for I think people who are going to be more successful over these next 5 or 10 years, as things change so significantly, I think two things that I'm continuing to encourage myself to do, are to stay curious and to put yourself out there. I just think you got to try things. To that point before where no one really knows what's going on, you have to be willing to try things. I don't know, do you speak another language? [00:15:25] S1: Russian, yeah.
00:15:26 · Adam Mosseri
[00:15:26] S0: Yeah. So when you learn another language, I think one of the most important things and one of the best predictors, this is my guess, I don't have any research on this, about are you going to get good at speaking, is are you willing to sound like an idiot? Are you willing just to say it and be corrected, and not be offended, and then just get better and better? You just have to put yourself out there. And with all of these new tools and models and technologies, I think you just have to be willing to try stuff. So if you're curious when you try stuff, I think that you'll learn, you'll adapt. But if you're not curious or you're not willing to make mistakes or try things, I think you're in a ton of trouble, or at least I think it's going to be a really difficult time. So those, I think, are premiums, not just for hiring at a company like Meta or a team like Instagram, but I just think across the industry, and multiple industries over the next 10 to 20 years. Is this something that maybe we're looking for less of? For some of these functions, I think that there's some that are still going to be very large teams, and so you need people who are really good at managing large organizations. Large organizational leadership is its own craft and skill. It's actually different than management. But I do think there'll be less of those roles. I think we'll have more smaller teams, and there'll be less people who manage thousands of people. And so that's not that job will go away, but that will be less of what I'm looking for in hires, because I'm going to have less roles like that.
00:16:48 · Lenny Rachitsky
[00:16:48] S1: Something I'm hearing from a few folks is AI is almost kind of resetting people's impact and success, in terms of some people that were maybe low performers pre-AI can now do ... Like things they were bad at, AI now allows them to do. And now they're thriving, building all these things, helping other people. Do you see that at all? Just AI is just lifting other people up, maybe lowering some people down?
00:17:12 · Adam Mosseri
[00:17:12] S0: Yeah, I mean the job is just different. Take engineering. Engineering used to be, maybe not majority, but a large percentage, 40%, 50%, 60% writing code. It's not now, especially if you talk to anybody at these labs. They're spending most of their time planning and reviewing code. That is a very different job. You might hate that, and you might have loved just writing code. Or you might love that, and you might not have been that fast at writing code. So who succeeds is a function of whose strengths are aligned with the tools' needs and the business' needs. And so this is definitely happening. Another thing is you've had people who had good ideas about how to contribute it to other functions, but didn't have the mechanical or technical skills to do so. And AI reduces the boundary to do that, and then all of a sudden they can. For me, it's kind of funny because when I got hired at Facebook, all the designers had to be able to program. I went through a technical loop. We gave up on that because it was too hard to hire people. But I now get to program again for the first time in maybe 10 years. And, you know, I am not a good engineer. I'm a mediocre engineer on a good day. But now, I can write code responsibly, which is just an amazing thing. You're seeing this across all sorts of levels in seniority and functions. Designers who are programming, engineers who are pulling data and doing strong analyses, data scientists who are putting together proposals for designs. The tools aren't all great, by the way. I think too often we have this really polarized binary outlook on the state of AI. Like, are you AI-pilled or are you anti-AI? It's like, people are binary. I said that to the team yesterday. And the state of the tools isn't binary either. They're amazing at some things and remarkably bad at others. And the people who I think are going to make the most of it are the ones who are clear-eyed about what AI is good at and what it's not good at, and also have an instinct or a nose for what it will be good at and not good at next month or in a couple months from now.
00:19:38 · Lenny Rachitsky, Adam Mosseri
[00:19:38] S1: You mentioned that AI writes all our code now. Someone tweeted this idea that stuck with me for months now of just like, "Remember, we used to be able to just write code for free?" [00:19:52] S0: I think you'll still be able to write code for free, it'll just be with a smaller model, but yes. That is [inaudible 00:19:58]. [00:19:57] S1: I guess that's true. There's a model that are close to free, but it's like, yeah, that's crazy. Now it's just like totally- [00:20:04] S0: But just think about the cost, think about what you pay for a model now and what the level of intelligence you're getting from that model is. And then at that same price point a year ago, what were you getting? At some point, the incremental value won't matter. We're getting there I think with small projects and programming. I think the models will matter even beyond ... This week you've got Fable and, obviously, Mythos from Anthropic, but I spent a lot of time with that this week. For the first time, I'm like, "Oh, I'm just talking to a much more technical, much smarter engineer than I am." The next version, a year out, of that model, do I need to pay for frontier tokens for whatever Anthropic model 6.0 is? Or is Fable just fine for all of my side projects? Probably just fine. Probably pretty cheap by then too.