00:33:27 · Baiju Bhatt
[00:33:27] S1: And you took the chips and you moved them right next to the receiver. It's like, well, no. Why don't you move them right next to the satellite? Next to the laser, like, just get rid of the laser. What if you put the solar panels? This was the original kind of, like, intuitive concept. What if you put the solar panels and you put the GPUs on the backs of the solar panels? Like, why... That's not actually the the architecture that I think you would go with for this because because of other constraints. But as a thought experiment, like, isn't that the most direct marriaging of the application, and the sort of like energy provider for that application? And then as I started doing more and more thinking about, for example, the thermodynamics of this, the radiation shielding, etcetera, etcetera, it became clear that it was going to be hard, but there weren't any obvious showstoppers. Moreover, by actually putting the thing that's consuming the power right next to the power generation, it's actually kind of a magical architecture. Right? Because the real benefit of this is going to be, as we look out over the next handful of years, the time it takes to bring a new data center online, it's like five to eight years. Like there's a real crunch here, right? This has the potential to be a massive accelerant in that in that you can take the chips of which there's gonna be an overabundance of at some point. I think I tend to agree with you a lot on that. Imagine a factory where, you know, like a truck full of chips comes in on one side, takes a week, couple of weeks, month, let's say a couple of months to turn those chips, integrate them with the solar panels, build satellites out of them, build stacks of these things.
00:35:19 · Ty Morse, Baiju Bhatt
[00:35:19] S0: Rent a Falcon and ship them up? Exactly. [00:35:22] S1: Yeah. And then as soon as they're in orbit effectively, they're online. Right? [00:35:27] S0: And then [00:35:28] S1: you would also like to work [00:35:29] S0: together with lasers. [00:35:30] S1: Yeah. Yeah. So that's where the laser technology is gonna, I think, be a very important reused sort of core component that ties these two different applications together. [00:35:43] S0: Yeah. I think one of the biggest, like, critiques was just having, like, a massive megastructure in space and, you know, slight, like, I don't know, like variations or anything could just destroy the entire thing. And if you just have, like, small satellites, they're all network together with lasers, there's not really any issue. [00:35:58] S1: Yeah. Yeah. I think, I would love to live in a world where these, like, massive megastructures exist in space. There's there's probably a way of engineering them. It's just not terribly economically feasible in '26. At least right now. Not right now. I wanna come back to something. Okay. And I wanna share a little wisdom with you, young Padawan. Okay. This is coming back to that rendering of Brian Chesky. [00:36:25] S0: The way asterisk this? That was, like, three years ago. We've gotten a little bit better, Baiju. Thank you. [00:36:30] S1: Now go on. The way if you if you really want to show reverence and respect for somebody. Right? [00:36:36] S0: Right. [00:36:36] S1: Take the example of what I've done with this mural here [00:36:39] S0: No. It's for
00:36:39 · Ty Morse, Baiju Bhatt
[00:36:39] S0: No. It's for [00:36:39] S1: our founding fathers. Right? [00:36:40] S0: Totally agree. [00:36:41] S1: Look at look at the the pec muscle definition that George Washington has. Next time, you should just make, you know, whoever said founder is, just make him look [00:36:55] S0: Jack as fuck. Unbelievably ripped. Alright. Brian Chesky, if I ever interview you, we will edit that in post to make you even more... We can start the interview with, like, I don't know, squats or something. [00:37:07] S1: Yeah. Just make him look like a fucking superhero. Like, really, really ripped. [00:37:11] S0: Yeah. Are the things why I'm fixating on this. These are the things as well. Because you notice something that should have been done differently, [00:37:17] S1: and you care. [00:37:18] S0: You know? [00:37:19] S1: Yeah. Also, if you ever make any renderings of me, I would, you know, just go and ask that you apply that to me as well. Yeah. [00:37:26] S0: Yeah. No problem, Baiju. You know, you talked about intuition. You also talked about how, like, you have this start of intuition, you have this new idea, and you're thinking maybe this might work. And you start out with that intuition, but you know that your intuition is gonna evolve over time and you basically don't wanna be like overconfident at any point in the time Yep. To... And make decisions. Like hypothetically, you could say this is the path. I'm gonna hire 500 people and just go after this, But that's probably not like the optimal where you aren't gonna actually do the thing that [00:37:52] S1: you want to
00:37:52 · Baiju Bhatt, Ty Morse
[00:37:52] S1: you want to [00:37:52] S0: do if you do that. Nope. And so how do you think about when you're just coming up to speed on something and deciding, you know, where is the confidence interval that you should be at any given point in time. Mhmm. And then how do you most rapidly learn and, like, reflect on your intuition, ideas, and update them Yep. To basically have that cycle fast. [00:38:13] S1: My philosophy is get your failures out of the way quickly. [00:38:17] S0: Okay. What's an example?
00:38:17 · Ty Morse, Baiju Bhatt
[00:38:17] S0: Okay. What's an example? [00:38:20] S1: Oh my gosh. So get your failures out of the quickly. The the example of this that's the most obvious one to me is the story that led up to Robinhood. So a lot of people don't know that Robinhood, as you see it today was not the first app that we built. We built an app before that. So, Ryan, the story. There's a point in time where, you know, my co founder and I were starting Robinhood. We were not consumer tech people. We were like math and physics nerds that were doing computerized trading stuff. And we were reminded by a lot of VCs early on that we had no idea what the fuck we were doing and that we were probably not going to be terribly successful at building consumer products. And they were wrong. But... And so there was this there was this, like, question of, like, how do you go from not knowing how to make a consumer product to being good at it ideally? Like, how do you learn the thing? And one really sage piece of advice that I got early on was, like, get your failures out of the way quickly. And so what does that mean? It means like, don't be too precious with the idea. Just try it. Even if the idea is not perfect, you're gonna learn way more by going from like, by completing the loop. So from like idea to, like, finished version of it to did the finished version when released to the market work or not work. Right? It's [00:39:45] S0: like the the Brian r... Armstrong thing where he says action produces information. [00:39:49] S1: Action produces information? Yeah. That's a smart thing to say.
00:39:49 · Baiju Bhatt, Ty Morse
[00:39:49] S1: Action produces information? Yeah. That's a smart thing to say. [00:39:53] S0: Yeah. [00:39:53] S1: Yeah. That's a that's a very succinct way of putting it up. My version of it is get your failures out of the way quickly. So in the example of Robinhood, we were, like, in the process of trying to get our broker dealer license so that we could release the thing that people use today. There was a period of time where we didn't have it, and we're like, but we still want to make a mobile app, so we can start to kind of build some of the functionality that's not the brokerage stuff, but, like, you know, maybe just news and content, like adjacent things. So we built this app called Analyst, which we then renamed to Robinhood. [00:40:29] S0: Why'd you name it Analyst? [00:40:32] S1: I don't know. [00:40:32] S0: Just a reason? Just random? [00:40:34] S1: It wasn't... [00:40:34] S0: Yeah. Thinking financial stocks Analysts. Analysts. [00:40:37] S1: Yeah. Again, like Okay. Get your failures out of the way quickly. We picked a name and then ended up realizing that there was a better name called Robinhood. But that app, we released it on the App Store, and this is out there. It was, like, 2013. It's publicly out there. And I remember where, like... It was, like, you know, I think we called it your stock market companion, if I'm remembering correctly. That was the tagline for it. We announce it, and we get some people to use it. And I remember seeing the usage of how many people are, like, continuing to use it after that first announcement just sort of