Acquired
02:04:08 · David Rosenthal
[02:04:08] S1: Yep. So if you're a prospective competitor to Vanguard and you wanna offer competitive, you know, index funds at similarly low cost, well, all of a sudden, if you can now make a bunch of profits on trading in and out of ETFs in those funds on your brokerage platform, that's a way to make money here. Yep. So Jack hates that. He also hates that because these funds will now be traded on an exchange, it means that you can short sell them. And he thinks this will just be like a absolute disaster for the financial industry. You know? And, hey. Look. Like, I would definitely not recommend going and short selling at the S and P 500. That has historically been a losing game in the long run. But look. This is a product people want, and shorting indexes like the S and P 500 is like a core part of many hedge funds strategies today. This is an idea whose time had come with all the good and all the bad, and it needed to exist. So Jack turns it down, and not just turns it down, but like he hates the concept of ETFs. Nathan goes on to launch the world's first ETF with a new asset management division of a old Boston bank named State Street. And you've probably heard the State Street name today. You might have heard of the SPDR. SPDR. Well known SPDR, Standard and Poor's Depository Receipts Trust, which is the listing for State Street's S and P 500 ETF, which until recently, like a year or two ago, was the largest ETF in the world until it was surpassed by Vanguard and BlackRock after Jack's time. Well, after Jack's time. So, yeah, this was a really bad decision by Jack to pass on ETFs. Today, ETFs are a huge part of the mutual fund industry. They are still only about half the assets in aggregate of traditional mutual funds, but ETFs are growing at, like, 30% per year while mutual funds are flat. So if that keeps up at some point here in the next small set of years, ETF assets will pass traditional mutual funds to become the, you know, largest equity asset class in the world. Yep. So listeners, why
02:06:32 · Ben Gilbert, David Rosenthal
[02:06:32] S0: does this matter? Why are we explaining the difference between ETFs and mutual funds here on acquired? I think the most interesting reason is that it was the thing where it was clear that the founder really should hand over the reins. This should not have been a sticking point. This should not have been even a decision for the company. This was clearly the right thing to do long term. And whether or not you understand the mechanics of a mutual fund versus an ETF, and and we dramatically oversimplified and skipped some things. It is just so perfectly illustrative of this point of [02:07:04] S1: Vanguard had to get into ETFs. Yeah. [02:07:07] S0: And that purity of the founder is is the thing that is required to start the company, but typically not sufficient to scale and keep them globally relevant. [02:07:17] S1: Yep. Yep. [02:07:18] S0: And we see this in Ferrari with Enzo. You see this with Apple, the Steve Jobs, Tim Cook. You see it in the NFL, with Coca Cola, with Trader Joe's. I mean, this phenomenon just shows up over and over again.
02:07:18 · Ben Gilbert, David Rosenthal
[02:07:18] S0: And we see this in Ferrari with Enzo. You see this with Apple, the Steve Jobs, Tim Cook. You see it in the NFL, with Coca Cola, with Trader Joe's. I mean, this phenomenon just shows up over and over again. [02:07:30] S1: Yep. Yep. And this is how it showed up in Vegard. So in August 1999, this finally comes to a head on the board. Brennan and the management team say we we gotta launch ETFs. We're so far behind. State Street is out to this huge lead. They're building all this market share in a S and P 500 index that we started this. This is our space to own, and our our customers, our clients are demanding it. Yep. Jack is staunchly against it. And so in August 1999, Vanguard announces that it is enforcing its mandatory board retirement age in the bylaws of 70. No board member can serve past the year in which they turned 70. Jack has turned 70 that year and that mister Bogle will be stepping down from the board at the end of the year in December. This is a big deal. This causes a huge public outcry. [02:08:28] S0: Also, there's someone older than him who is on the board that they don't enforce it for. [02:08:35] S1: Right. [02:08:35] S0: So it's not really about the age requirement. It's it's about the overstaying your welcome, but he is the face of a movement. [02:08:44] S1: Right. So unlike the last time Jack got fired where his former partners were probably hoping he would go quietly into the night, that's not an option here because [02:08:58] S0: He's a giant asset to Vanguard.
02:08:58 · Ben Gilbert, David Rosenthal
[02:08:58] S0: He's a giant asset to Vanguard. [02:09:00] S1: Yes. By this time, Jack has become like a synced to the investing public. People had actually started calling him Saint Jack. And when he stepped down as CEO in 1996, you know, head of the heart transplant, the company had commissioned a statue of him to be erected. There is no option to just, part ways with Jack Bogle. [02:09:24] S0: You kinda want him to keep an office at headquarters if, you know, he's alive and there's a statue of him there and the entire investing community. And increasingly, consumers Yes. Are finding religion following his teachings. [02:09:39] S1: So the year before this in 1998, a passionate, passionate group of users on Morningstar's online discussion forums on the morningstar.com website I love it. Had founded a dedicated subforum called Vanguard DieHards that would eventually morph into its own website and, like, grassroots movement called Bogleheads. [02:10:09] S0: By the way, I love this subreddit. I've been on this subreddit for a long time, long before we started researching this episode. It is a beautiful thing to watch these conversations. [02:10:17] S1: It is incredible. So the standalone Bogleheads forum, bogleheads.org. Today, it gets 2,000,000 visitors per month. And then, Ben, you mentioned the subreddit that has 400,000 weekly active visitors. [02:10:34] S0: And if you are listening to this episode because it was posted on there, welcome to the show.
02:10:34 · Ben Gilbert, David Rosenthal
[02:10:34] S0: And if you are listening to this episode because it was posted on there, welcome to the show. [02:10:38] S1: Thanks for joining us. So as I said, the compromise that they reach is Jack will still be the founder of Vanguard. Jack will still be the face and the spirit of Vanguard to all of the millions of fans and diehards around America and around the world. But he will no longer be on the board. He will no longer be involved in active management of the company. They set up the Bogle Financial Markets Research Center on campus, which Jack leads, with a staff helping him for the next twenty years of researching, speaking, writing books, papers, and generally just evangelizing the index investing philosophy, all of which, of course, is, like, the very, very best marketing that I would say buy. You you can't even possibly buy marketing like this for all of the conflict and strife around this second firing, it really works out about as good as it possibly could for the company and for Jack. His legacy is preserved. His value to the company is preserved, and Vanguard gets to move on and launch ETFs, which they do in 2001, finally. Which [02:11:55] S0: he did soften on over time. [02:11:58] S1: Yes. And he does eventually repair his relationships with management of the company, especially after Brennan steps down in 2008 and the next CEO, Bill McNabb, succeeds him.
02:11:58 · David Rosenthal, Ben Gilbert
[02:11:58] S1: Yes. And he does eventually repair his relationships with management of the company, especially after Brennan steps down in 2008 and the next CEO, Bill McNabb, succeeds him. [02:12:11] S0: Yep. And there's a few things we sort of skipped over to this point that happened in the seventies, eighties, and then happened in a big way here in the nineties, and that's changes in the structure of the investment management industry. The first one to know is indexing was not actually that interesting when Bogle started it. I know we gave the stats around its outperformance net of fees, but in '75, the market still had a lot of fools in it. Yeah. People that were acting individually that were not institutions or advised by financial advisers. They were clients of stockbrokers, and the stockbroker would make a commission on a trade. And so they would trade a lot, and they would buy stuff that were bad decisions. And so if you were an active manager, it was just not actually that hard to beat all the fools in the market. [02:13:13] S1: Yes.