00:03:16 · John Coogan, Jordi Hays
And now it's, and now it's tucked in under that, modal, so you have to enable legacy models. And I always thought that they should just remove it. But I wasn't I wasn't even saying that because I thought it was one shotting people. I just thought, hey. Let's clean it up. Like like, consumers don't need to know version numbers for models. And my example is always Google. [00:03:40] S1: Consumers disagree.
00:03:40 · Jordi Hays, John Coogan
[00:03:40] S1: Consumers disagree. [00:03:41] S0: Some consumers do disagree. The question is how many consumers, how how what percentage of their consumers, how big of an issue is this? When you think about Google as a consumer, you don't care what version of the rank ranking algorithm you're on. You might have a worse experience one day. You you Google something. It you don't find it. The next day, you go, hey. They found it for you. They probably changed the algorithm. But there and there have been big updates to the algorithm. Back in 2013, they released Hummingbird, which was the code name. And they came out, and they actually did a presentation. They said, hey. We have a new update to our algorithm. It'll handle natural language more effectively. So if you go to Google search and you say, what is the capital of Russia? It won't get confused by what is the capital of. You could just type in whereas before, you need to say Russia plus capital, you know, and then it would find it. But it would get confused by the natural language. And and Google fixed that. They rolled it out. Interestingly, they they had this event where they where they announced, hey. We we have this new this new algorithm update, Hummingbird. And guess what? It's actually been live for a month. They announced it at this event, and it'd already been live live for a month. No one was complaining. No one noticed. Yeah. Because it just improved the Google search experience. [00:05:01] S1: Yeah. I bet I bet people that were, like, keyword hacking
00:05:01 · Jordi Hays, John Coogan, Tyler, Healey Cypher
[00:05:01] S1: Yeah. I bet I bet people that were, like, keyword hacking [00:05:04] S0: For sure. Encouraging folks, for sure. For sure, they noticed. And Panda was another update. There were a number of these updates where if this was your business, you knew. And I'm not saying OpenAI shouldn't share model numbers and version numbers with their enterprise customers or with their b to b customers or API customers. I'm saying in the actual ChatGPT app, don't tell people what they're using. Just improve it, and and let them complain a little bit all over the place when you're making minor changes. [00:05:32] S1: If they do that, they lose the companion market. [00:05:34] S0: Maybe. Maybe. I don't know. That's my question is why why can't GPTOSS fit in there? Why can't if you want a permanent model that you can run forever, like, what what why is that model not satisfactory? [00:05:50] S1: If you're gonna fall in love with a model, make sure it's open source. [00:05:54] S0: And, yeah, there's a tune it. Not your server, not your girlfriend, right, or not your waifu not your waits, not your waifu. That's that's what they say. I'm not kidding. People believe this. But but but the but the broader four o community was not able to migrate to GPTOSS. Now, Tyler, you had a take on this. You think that GPTOSS just isn't at the level of four point zero? [00:06:16] S2: Yeah. It's just not that. I mean, it's like a fine open source model. [00:06:21] S3: Why? It's just not [00:06:22] S0: But it's been eighteen months. Or or, I mean, when did GPT OSS come out? Like, six months ago, I mean?
00:06:22 · John Coogan, Tyler, Healey Cypher, John Tennant
[00:06:22] S0: But it's been eighteen months. Or or, I mean, when did GPT OSS come out? Like, six months ago, I mean? [00:06:28] S2: I also don't think people don't like four o just because it's, like, super smart. It's because it has, like, the personality. [00:06:33] S0: It has the texture, the flavor. Yes, that's correct. [00:06:35] S3: It's like the [00:06:35] S2: big model smell. [00:06:36] S0: And yes, yes, yes. And so it's been a year, and it's been a year. And so there's a one year gap where the open source community should be able to cap catch up to four point zero's ineffable qualities. It's. It's. [00:06:53] S2: Well, I mean, for a while, you've had open source models that have been, like, personality, like, forward. Right? It's like replica. Yeah. Or what was Noam Shazir's company? I'm I'm forgetting the [00:07:03] S4: name. Character. [00:07:04] S2: Character AI. [00:07:04] S4: Character AI. It's like
00:07:04 · John Tennant, Tyler, John Coogan
[00:07:04] S4: Character AI. It's like [00:07:05] S2: very similar thing. It's just personalities. Yeah. And I mean, a lot of people use those. I I'm I'm actually curious what the numbers are compared to four o of like the one shotted four o people. Yeah. But I think it's probably pretty comparable. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I I don't like the my my whole take on the four o thing was like one shotting four o is like not a good thing. Mhmm. But if if you completely kill it, how many of those people will then go to open source models that are totally unfiltered where there's no kind of oversight? Yeah. And that seems much worse because then if if if someone is saying like super dangerous stuff, then you can't step in at all. Yeah. I think stepping in at some point is good. So you like you it's like part of you wants to keep those people on the platforms, then you can have oversight. But also, you don't wanna be, like Yeah. Yeah. Continuing this. [00:07:49] S0: Yes. It does seem it does seem more responsible. I don't know. Where do you land on it? Kill four o or leave four o tucked behind the the menu options? Give in to the keep four-zero crowd. Because one
00:07:49 · John Coogan, Jordi Hays
[00:07:49] S0: Yes. It does seem it does seem more responsible. I don't know. Where do you land on it? Kill four o or leave four o tucked behind the the menu options? Give in to the keep four-zero crowd. Because one [00:08:03] S1: think of the the real real questions question ChatGPT latest numbers are 800,000,000 weekly actives. 20,000,000 of those people pay. What percentage of the 20,000,000 that are paying are using it for this companionship functionality? And that is like a huge unknown right now. And so I think my they're like they they they deprecated four o. Yeah. They got a horrible pushback from folks. The question is, did they did they bring it back because people just were really upset? Or did they bring it back because they were about to lose? And remember Yeah. The two days after every single Reddit post Yeah. At least every other was like, I could just cancel my membership. Like, I don't need this anymore. [00:08:53] S0: And so, yeah, I was I was thinking about the the Sydney Sweeney American Eagle thing. Like, that got a really powerful negative reaction. The stock is up. And, like, sales are up presumably because, like, it got a negative reaction, but it also got a positive reaction that was bigger. Right? And so I'm wondering, like [00:09:11] S1: Yeah. But in this in this case, it it could have been that four o was effectively a product that was generating hundreds of millions of dollars of annual annualized revenue. [00:09:20] S0: Yep. That was [00:09:20] S1: now And that was just gonna go away. [00:09:22] S0: It was just not like people