Lenny's Podcast: Product | Career | Growth
00:49:28 · Molly Graham
[00:49:28] S1: Yeah. And I think the second thing that's really different, and we talked about a little bit already, but my message was always you give things away because the only way you can make space for new opportunity is by giving things away. Do you know what I mean? And that has two assumptions under it. One, that it's good to give things away. And two, that there's new opportunity on the other side. And I think this, what I talked about with the fear narrative is one of the things that's driving me nuts in the world. And we talk about it a lot in Glue Club is just this dominant narrative that all these jobs are going away because of AI and all these layoffs that are branded as AI. That is not going to support anybody being in a stance of like, "Yeah, let's delegate everything to these robots. Let's give them every piece of our brain and our data so that we can have all this new opportunity that's coming along." I think it is the hardest conversation to have right now. And to your point about there's lots of people out there that are really excited, there are. And I want that for everyone because this is an incredible moment. I've been in technology for almost 20 years and I've seen a lot, but this is one of those moments. This is the mobile phone on steroids where it's like all sorts of businesses are going to be created. I'm a believer that a lot of jobs are going to be created because of this technology, but I think we've got to start having that conversation in order to get to the place where everyone can be leaning in. Everyone can say, "Oh, it's great to automate all these tasks that I hate because it gives me more time to do the things that I love." Which is, I think to your point about the people that feel amplified by it's like, "Oh, I don't have to do all this boring ass work. I can just focus on the things that bring me joy. I can focus on the things that I'm great at." That's what we want. But while there's this narrative out there that media companies are propagating that says there's nothing for you on the other side, do you know what I mean? We've got universal basic income. Everyone needs to be supported by the state because no one's going to have a job in 10 years. Who the fuck wants to give Legos to robots if that's the narrative? No one. I've heard of it.
00:51:55 · Lenny Rachitsky
[00:51:55] S0: Tim O'Reilly who started O'Reilly Media, awesome smart guy, he came up with web 2. 0 as a concept. He organizes these little intimate camps where he invites people that he thinks can contribute to this conversation to talk about a topic. And this last one is around just what happens with humans when AI does more and more of our job. And it started with him talking to some, I think it was a lawyer who's just like, "Okay, I'm hoarding this very specific knowledge I have about doing this job so that AI cannot do it. It's like I need to protect it because otherwise I'm going to be replaced. They don't need me anymore." And I feel like a lot of people are probably feeling that, a lot of specific niche professions especially.
00:52:38 · Molly Graham
[00:52:38] S1: Yeah, absolutely. And I go back... First of all, yes, of course. How could you not be feeling that way? I don't know. Maybe I'm an abundance person, and maybe I'll regret saying this in six months or five years, but I'm like, "Every piece of data I have from my entire life and some of these conversations I've had like the one with Manoush say, 'You got to lean in.'" You know what I mean? That protection and holding on and gripping to what you know is not the way you thrive in change. It's not the people that define the future. And again, the Manoush story would say lawyers are always going to exist. They are going to look completely different every six years or every three years or whatever. So what do you think the next version of a lawyer looks like? Do you want to be part of designing that? Do you want to be part of creating that? Do you want to be part of figuring that out or do you want to stay here and try to protect what you know? I think that's to me, again, it's scary out there right now, so I don't want to undervalue that, but I think you have to take that stance of agency or we got to use a different word, entrepreneurship. You got to take that stance of, "I want to be part of designing the future of my profession, not protecting the past."
00:54:02 · Lenny Rachitsky, Molly Graham
[00:54:02] S0: I really, really love this framework as almost maybe that's a big part of the advice from this conversation is this way of thinking for Manoush, which is, "My job will be different, but it'll continue to exist." And the question is just, "What will it be?" And let me think about that, prepare for that almost and not try to resist because resisting is not going to work anyway. [00:54:24] S1: Yeah. And if you listen to the Manoush's story, it's such an entrepreneurial story. And I know that not everyone is great at that, but it is very much the, "Let me try this next." For her, I think it was founded in this belief of this profession is evolving and changing, and I want to be part of defining the future of it. And again, I think until the data genuinely tells us otherwise, I would say that is the stance I would take particularly in tech. What would you do if you believe there were going to be more and different interesting engineering jobs in five years? How would you behave if you believed there was opportunity on the other side of letting go?
00:54:24 · Molly Graham, Lenny Rachitsky
[00:54:24] S1: Yeah. And if you listen to the Manoush's story, it's such an entrepreneurial story. And I know that not everyone is great at that, but it is very much the, "Let me try this next." For her, I think it was founded in this belief of this profession is evolving and changing, and I want to be part of defining the future of it. And again, I think until the data genuinely tells us otherwise, I would say that is the stance I would take particularly in tech. What would you do if you believe there were going to be more and different interesting engineering jobs in five years? How would you behave if you believed there was opportunity on the other side of letting go? [00:55:11] S0: Well, let's see if there's more to that thread because that's really helpful, which is, "Okay, this is going to go great. My product managers will thrive. There'll be more need for product managers because a lot of listeners here are PMs, engineers, founders." So what do you think people should be trying to do in that world where there will be more? Is it pay attention to how you're amplified? Is it look at people who are doing great and do what they're doing? What do you think people could be doing to succeed in that future?
00:55:42 · Molly Graham
[00:55:42] S1: It's funny, we had a conversation. My team and I run these top talent cohorts at companies, and a lot of what we do is get leaders talking to each other and helping each other. And this woman who is a head of design brought this problem where she was like, "They won't let me ship code." She's like, "I did it. I basically built the thing." And I was like, "Just let me get into production." And she was like, "Talking to engineering was like a brick wall where they were like, 'No, you can't ship code. You're a designer. I'm an engineer. I own what goes to production.'" And there are good reasons for not letting things go willy-nilly to production, particularly if you work in the financial space, which they did. I get it. But I think so much of the stance is we got to break down some of these walls between what was a designer, what was an engineer, what was a PM? This is obviously a lot of what's happening, but how do we really shed what we knew, which again is hard. It's hard to let go of those Legos, you know what I mean? And imagine, "Okay, what does it look like?" This is why I think the startup land is so happy is because they're not fighting against the way things were. They're inventing the way things could be. And how can you make more space for that inside of a company to me is the number one thing I talk about when I go, which is if you're not leaning into the creativity conversation versus the fear conversation, you are leading folks who are just terrified. How do you get people into a stance of, "I'm excited, and I want to try things, and I want to tentatively let this designership code to production"? So to me, I think how can you imagine a world with less walls? How can you get rid of some of those walls that have felt so important for the way we've done things for the last 15, 20, 25 years? I think that is a conversation that a lot of folks should be having.